Armenia to Limit Cash Payments

The Armenian Parliament passed a bill setting amendments to the law “On non-cash payments” and a number of related laws. Under new changes, all transactions exceeding AMD 300,000 (approx. USD 700) made by individuals in Armenia are to be carried out noncash.

The regulations apply to payments for goods, sale, and purchase of property, use of goods, execution of work, provision of services, payment of salaries, etc. There are certain areas where the threshold is zero, such as budgetary receipts and payments, health care, education and legal services. For transactions, requiring state registration of rights, the threshold is 500,000 AMD.

For some payments, the regulations will come into force – in 2022 for the capital Yerevan, and in 2023 for provincial towns, and in 2024 throughout Armenia. In case of non-compliance with the requirements, the contract will be considered invalid․

According to officials, the AMD 300,000 threshold was chosen based on the results of studies and the actual volume of transactions. It is also noted that the transition to cashless payments is part of a plan to shift to a digital economy.

Armenia is not the only country in the world with cash payment limits.

  • In France, cash payment limits are based on residency. Cash payment limits for residents are EUR 3,000 and for non-residents acting as consumers, is EUR 15,000.
  • In the UK the consumers can make cash payments without any limits. The traders, however, need to register themselves with tax authorities as “High-Value Dealers” if accepting cash payments over EUR 15,000.
  • Bulgarian regulations limit cash transactions up to 10,000 leva (approx. EUR 5,112). If the transaction is over that limit, then the payment should be made by bank transfer. The same applies also in any case where the purchase price is over EUR 5,112, and payment is made in parts.
  • Spain, since November 2012, the limit is EUR 2,500 for residents and EUR 15,000 for non–residents. If the amount is higher, the payment should be done by bank. Failure to follow this precept might result in a fine of up to 25% of the total transferred amount.

In respect of regulations in Armenia, it should also be highlighted that the above-mentioned regulations are far too broad to cover all possible scenarios, necessitating a more precise approach in each circumstance. However, one thing is certain; they will create and promote a new non-cash payment culture in Armenia.

The Ad Hoc Committee in Edmond Khudyan and Arin Capital & Investment Corp v Armenia (ICSID) is constituted.

June 1, 2022. The ad hoc Committee in Edmond Khudyan and Arin Capital & Investment Corp v Armenia (ICSID Case No. ARB/17/36, Annulment Proceeding) is constituted in accordance with Article 52(3) of the ICSID Convention.

Its members are:

Christopher Greenwood (British), President;
Tina Cicchetti (Canadian/Italian), and
Ucheora Onwuamaegbu, PhD (British/Nigerian).

All members appointed by the Chairman of the Administrative Council.

Party Representatives:

Claimants:

Redbridge, Yerevan, Armenia
Dr. Gevorg Tumanov.

Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
Mr. James Boykin, and Mr. Alex Bedrosyan.

Respondent:

Office of the Representative of the Republic of Armenia before the European Court of Human Rights, Yerevan, Armenia.

What Is a Grandfather Clause?

A grandfather clause, or legacy clause, is an exemption that allows persons or entities to continue with activities or operations that were approved before the implementation of new rules, regulations, or laws. Such allowances can be permanent, temporary, or instituted with limits.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • A legacy clause is a provision that allows people or entities to follow old rules that once governed their activity instead of newly implemented ones, often for a limited time.
  • The “grandfather clause” term originated during the U.S. Civil War era and referred to statutes enacted in the South to suppress African American voting.
    Legacy clauses can be permanent, temporary, or instituted with limits.
  • Legacy clauses often apply to zoning laws when the purpose of a development changes.

An Example of a Grandfather Clause in Armenia.

The Law of Armenia on Foreign Investments. Article 7. “In the event of amendments to the foreign investment legislation of the Republic of Armenia, the legislation that was effective at the moment of implementation of investments shall be applied, upon the request of a foreign investor, during a five years period from that moment.”

Redbridge is a member of IP-Coster Platform

Redbridge has become a member of IP-Coster Platform. IP-Coster is designed to generate accurate cost estimates, initiate direct filings, and provide workflow solutions for patents, utility models, trademarks, and industrial designs all over the world. The platform compiles all national legislation aspects of Intellectual Property Laws to facilitate foreign filings. The platform offers the following solutions:

QUOTATION

  • 160+ jurisdictions
  • Accurate official and reasonable agent rates
  • Detailed quotation within minutes

FILING

  • Professional support of your cases within application lifecycle
  • Exchange of documents, invoices & messages via secure client portal
  • 220+ reliable agents
  • 2500+ members of IP-Coster Network worldwide

DOCKETING

  • 24/7 online access to complete case information
  • case status monitoring
  • automatic notification of deadlines
  • option of data exchange with external databases

OUTSOURCING

  •  IP portfolio management
  •  Around-the-clock access to your cases
  •  IP recordals
  •  trademark renewals and patent maintenance fees

See more: https://www.ip-coster.com/

Annulment of ICSID Award in Edmond Khudyan and Arin Capital & Investment Corp. v. Republic of Armenia Case

On April 13, 2022, the Secretary-General of ICSID registered an application for partial annulment of the award filed by Mr. Edmond Khudyan (Claimant) and notifies the parties of the provisional stay of enforcement of the award in ICSID Case.

According to the Claimant, there is no legal source that affirmatively supports the notion that Mr. Khudyan ever became a citizen of the Republic of Armenia. The Tribunal derived its sole support for that premise from its own inaccurate paraphrasing of Article 15 of Soviet Law on the Procedure of Exiting the USSR, the effect of which would be to make every person who had ever lived in the Armenian SSR and emigrated abroad automatically a citizen of the Republic of Armenia in contradiction to the express terms of Republic’s own Citizenship Law. The Tribunal’s decision that it does not have jurisdiction over Mr. Khudyan because he is a citizen of the Republic of Armenia is not tenable, its flaws are clear on the face of the Award, and it does not stand up to even minor scrutiny when compared with the relevant legal sources that were brought to the Tribunal’s attention. It therefore constitutes a manifest excess of powers under Article 52(1)(b) of the Convention.

Therefore, Mr. Khudyan respectfully requests pursuant to the ICSID Convention the Award rendered on 15 December 2021 in ICSID Case No. ARB/17/36 be annulled.

This case concerns a dispute filed with the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”) pursuant to Armenia – USA BIT.
The Claimants are Mr. Edmond Khudyan, a national of the United States of America (“US”), and Arin Capital & Investment Corp., a corporation established under the laws of the State of California in the US (collectively, the “Claimants”).
The Claimants are represented in these proceedings by Dr. Gevorg Tumanov of Redbridge and Mr. James H. Boykin, and Mr. Alexander Bedrosyan of Hughes Hubbard & Reed.
1 4 5 6 7 8 13