Hostile takeover in Armenia: regional approach

Preventive measures to protect companies from hostile takeover in Armenia: regional approach

Much has been written about the methods and technologies of hostile takeover. However, the issue of protection against acquisitions remains insufficiently developed. The problem is that of the companies are fully confident in their invulnerability or in the absence of potential aggressors’ interest in their companies as a possible asset, which entails neglecting elementary means of corporate protection and legal prevention. However, this often leads to the fact that the owners of the company begin to worry about protection only when the attack has already been successfully carried out and they have completely lost control over the company.

What are the main tools that can be used by a company that has become the target of an attack or may become one soon?

The system of protective measures can be roughly divided into two main blocks:

  • Strategic or preventive measures aimed at creating reliable corporate protection and minimizing the risks of hostile takeover.
  • Tactical or operational actions, the main purpose of which is to prevent the seizure of control over the business in the context of an attack by the aggressor.

Let’s take a closer look at preventive measures, since they are the key to ensuring reliable corporate protection. These activities include:

    1. Monitoring the information environment around the companies.

The emergence of unwanted interest in the business from a third party usually manifests itself in a series of characteristic signals, which, if detected in a timely manner, the business owner can take the necessary measures to repel an attack. Such characteristic indicators include attempts to buy up a part of the company’s shares, requests from minority shareholders to hold extraordinary shareholders’ meetings or to provide documents, shareholders challenging the company’s transactions, unexpected inspections by regulatory and supervisory authorities, acquisitions in each industry, etc.

    1. Legal diagnostics.

The beginning of any hostile takeover is the collection and analysis of information about the target company – about its corporate structure, main shareholders, management, informal leaders, assets, partners, counterparties, administrative resources, etc. The volume and quality of the collected information by 90% determines the further takeover strategy that the acquiring company will choose. Thus, the potential acquiring company conducts a kind of diagnostics of the company – the goal, and its owners and management often do not even know about it. As a result of diagnostics, the main “pain points” of the company are determined and a program of actions is developed to eliminate or minimize them.

    1. Business restructuring.

A weakly protected business is characterized by the consolidation of ownership, management, and operational functions in one company, which simplifies the task of the aggressor (acquiring company) – to effectively absorb the business, the aggressor needs to intercept control in one single company. Therefore, one of the most effective preventive measures aimed at protecting a company from hostile takeover is restructuring. The implementation of such a restructuring makes it possible to solve several problems at once: to remove the main production assets of the business from the risk zone, to optimize financial flows and to ensure the protection of the business owners directly.

    1. Amendments to the charter and other documents of the company.

All contradictions, gaps, and shortcomings of such internal documents as the charter and internal regulations on governing bodies are always skillfully used by aggressors to achieve their goals. Typical shortcomings of such documents in practice are contradictions with peremptory norms of the law, excessive procedural encumbrances, lack of proper regulation of complex corporate aspects.

    1. Protection of information.

This block of protective actions includes the development and implementation of a regulation on the protection of confidential information of the company. It may determine the procedure for providing documents and information to any third parties, communication with the press, etc.

    1. Creation of a consolidated block of shares and a “cross-ownership” scheme.

The following picture is classic for hostile takeovers: the target company has a “loose” authorized capital, in which, in the absence of a powerful consolidated package belonging to the business owner or top management, a significant number of shares are dispersed among minority shareholders, most of which are current or former “members” of the company. In this situation, the aggressors (acquiring company) simply carried out an active purchase of shares from minority shareholders, who happily got rid of unnecessary “pieces of paper”. As a result, within a short period of time, a certain block of shares required by the law was formed, allowing the aggressor to hold a repeated extraordinary meeting of shareholders and take over the management of the company.

    1. Legal protection of fixed assets (property).

As a rule, the end goal of the aggressor is to gain control over some attractive asset, most often real estate, and much less often the acquiring company is attracted by a working business as such. In this regard, in the complex of preventive protective measures, one of the key positions is taken by measures for the legal protection of the main property assets of the company.

    1. Accounts payable management.

Overdue and poorly managed company accounts payable – targets often become the main starting point at the beginning of a corporate attack by an acquiring company. The existing debt claim rights are bought by the acquiring company at a significant discount from the company’s creditors.

    1. Working with top management, employees, and partners of the company.

Almost any company has some actual or potential conflict, for example, a conflict between the main shareholders of the company, conflicts between shareholders and management, conflicts between management and employees. Any of these conflicts, if it is serious enough, may be used by the acquiring company which may try to activate it as much as possible and use it for its own purposes. By participating in unleashing a conflict, the acquiring company can attract one of the conflicting parties to its side or receive all the information that needs.

Private Equity and Hedge Funds in Armenia

Private Equity and Hedge Funds in Armenia

In the western legal culture both PE and HFs are set up as either a limited partnership or limited liability corporation. The limited partnership is the traditional US instrument. Limited partnerships are also used in Europe, often with modified features to reflect the local tax and regulatory requirements․

According to the law of the Republic of Armenia “On Investment Funds” funds can be created and structured as:

  • Contractual fund (majority operating in Armenia): group of assets that are pooled based on contractual investment fund management contracts; or
  • Corporate fund: fund with the status of a legal entity, assets are being pooled only by the underwriting stocks or other stock securities.

In the case of HF and PEs, including VC, in addition to joint-stock companies, the organizational and legal form of a partnership founded on trust is provided by law.  Partnership founded on trust can be named as the Armenian analog of limited liability partnerships where general partners bear liability for the obligations of the partnership, and limited partners bear the risk of losses within the limits of amounts of investments provided and do not take part in the entrepreneurial activities conducted by the partnership.

What about investment structures?

  • Venture capital (VC) invests in early-stage or expanding businesses that generally have limited access to other sources of funding.
  • Leveraged buyouts (LBO) that tend to invest in more mature businesses, usually taking a controlling interest and leveraging their equity investment with substantial amounts of third-party debt. Buyout funds are typically significantly larger than venture funds, which reflects the relative size of their target investments.
  • Growth capital refers to equity investments, most often minority investments, in relatively mature companies that are looking for capital to expand or restructure operations, enter new markets or finance a major acquisition without a change in control of the business.
  • Distressed and Special situations։ Distressed or Special Situations is a broad category referring to investments in equity or debt securities of financially stressed companies.

The focus of HFs is on maximum short-term profits, so investments are primarily in highly liquid assets. Hedge funds by design are empowered to invest in a wide range of investments, with various funds focusing on derivatives, distressed firms, currency speculation, convertible bonds, emerging markets, merger arbitrage, and so on whatever the fund manager sees as offering high potential returns in a short period of time.

There are some requirements on the investment structure in Armenia:

Additional risk (HFs) and PE funds, including VC, are considered specialized funds. which means that total assets or a part thereof, but not less than 30% are targeted to be invested in certain types of assets.

In the case of the PE funds not less than 50% of the fund’s assets shall be invested in securities not allowed for sale in the regulated market.

If the PE fund acts as a VC, in the case according to the fund’s rules or charter, not less than 50% of the fund’s assets shall be invested in

  • securities not allowed for sale in the regulated market and issued by organizations that are newly created or
  • are in the early stage of their development, for the purpose of their growth, development or
  • enabling their securities to be sold in the regulated market.

The assets of the hedge fund shall be mainly formed:

  • Through issuing unlimited amount of debt and using derivative instruments and/or
  • Through the sale of such assets that the fund does not possess at the time of the transaction (short sale).

 

 

 

 

Արդյո՞ք «Գովազդի մասին» օրենքը բխում է հանրային շահից

Համաձայն «Գովազդի մասին» ՀՀ օրենքում սպասվող փոփոխությունների՝ նախատեսվում է արգելել ինտերնետ շահումով խաղերի, տոտալիզատորների կամ դրանց կազմակերպիչների գովազդը, այդ թվում՝ ռադիոյով, հեռուստատեսությամբ կամ համացանցով՝ որոշ բացառություններով։

Անշուշտ, նախագծի հիմնավորումից բխող իրավաչափ նպատակի՝ հանրային առավելագույն օգուտի ապահովման անհրաժեշտության հետ դժվար է չհամաձայնել, այդուհանդերձ, միայն նպատակի թիրախավորումը կարող է բավարար չլինել։ Անհրաժեշտ է նաև արդյունավետ գործիքակազմ նպատակին հասնելու և թիրախավորած նպատակներից դուրս գործող շահերին վնաս չպատճառելու համար։ Պետք է նկատի ունենալ, որ «հանրային շահը» ներառում է նաև այլ կոմպոնենտներ, որոնք ևս պետք է բավարար չափով ուշադրության արժանանան։ Մասնավորապես․

Օրենքն ընգրկում է շահառուների ավելի լայն շրջանակ։

Կասկած չի հարուցում, որ ոլորտի գովազդի սահամանափակումները շոշափելու են ոչ միայն անմիջական հասցեատերերի՝ տոտալիզատորների կամ ինտերնետ շահումով խաղերի կազմակերպիչների շահերը, այլ նաև փոփոխությունն ունենալու է մուլտիպլիկատիվ էֆեկտ, որի արդյունքում փոփոխությունների բացասական ազդեցությունը կրելու են նաև մեդիա ոլորտի տնտեսվարողները։ Պահանջարկի էական նվազման տնտեսական շղթան, իր մեջ ներառելու է նաև գովազդ արտադրող և գովազդակիր ընկերություններին։

«Հանրային շահի» ամբողջական ընկալում։

Առանձին քննարկման առարկա է օրենքի հիմնավորումների փաստարկվածությունը․ միանշանակ պնդումների հիմքում, տնտեսական հաշվարկներ, ըստ էության, դրված չեն։ Եվ եթե միակ չափանիշը գովազդվող պրոդուկտի բացարձակ հանրային օգտակարությունն է, ապա նույն տրամաբանությամբ կարելի է արգելել գազավորված ըմպելիքի ցանկացած գովազդ։ Մարդկային պահանջմունքները ենթադրում են նաև որոշ դեպքերում օգտակարության ընդհանուր պատկերացումներից դուրս ցանկություններ, իսկ ծայրահեղ իրավիճակներում հանրային շահի պաշտպանությունը կատարվում է իրավիճակային կիրառման ենթակա ինստիտուտների միջոցով ինչպիսին, օրինակ, անձին սահմանափակ գործունակ ճանաչելու մեխանզմն է։ Այս փուլում կարելի է ենթադրել, որ փոփոխությունների արդյունքում կրճատվելու և սահամանփակվելու են միայն ՀՀ հարկատու ընկերությունների կողմից վճարվող հարկերի ծավալները, սահմանափակումների հասցեատերերը դառնալու են ռեզիդենտ խաղային ոլորտի կազմակերպությունները, իսկ մրցակից օտարերկրյա խաղացողների կողմից ՀՀ օրենքների կիրառման շրջանակից դուրս գործող մեխանիզմներով, այդ թվում՝ օտարերկրյա մեդիա ընկերությունների միջոցով ցուցադրվող գովազդները ինտերնետային տիրույթում հավասարապես հասանելի են դառնալու ՀՀ սպառողներին։ Արդյունքում, տուժելու են հայաստանյան ընկերությունները, և շատ է հավանական որ չեն շահելու ՀՀ սպառողները։

Պատշաճ գործիքակազմ։ Տեխնիկապես հնարավոր է արդյո՞ք իրագործել ինտերնետային հասանելիության հայաստանյան տիրույթում տոտալիզատորների և ինտերնետ շահումով խաղերի գովազդի արգելքը։

Տեսականորեն միգուցե, սակայն գործնականում կիրառվող սահամանփակումների ազդեցությունը կարելի է տարածել միայն ռեզիդենտ կազմակերպությունների վրա։ Օտարերկրյա ընկերությունների կողմից մատուցվող նույնատիպ ծառայությունների գովազդը ՀՀ սպառողների շրջանում, թերևս, գործնականում դժվար է սահմանափակել։ Արդյունքում, ինտերնետային շահումով խաղերի և տոտալիազտորների ներպետական շուկայում ազգային ընկերությունները օտարերկրյա ընկերությունների համեմատությամբ հայտվելու են համեմատաբար առավել անբարենպաստ վիճակում։ Ինտերնետային հասանելիության տիրույթում տարածքային սահմանների բացակայությունը հանգեցնելու է օրենքով սահմանվող պահանջների գործնական կիրառելիության անհստակության, որի արդյունքում ՀՀ-ից հասանելի համացանցային ամբողջ տիրույթում շրջանառվող նպատատիպ գովազդների պարագայում, օրենքի կիրառությունը փաստացի դառնալու է անհնար, իսկ ՀՀ սպառողական շուկայի պաշտպանության նպատակը գործնականում մնալու է անկատար։

Protection of dignity or limitation of freedom of speech?

According to the amendments of the Criminal Code of Armenia, severe insult is henceforth a crime.


Insult and slander were previously criminalized in Armenia, but following recommendations and regulations of international organizations, such as the Regulation 1577/2007 of the EC, Armenia has decriminalized it in 2010.


The law gives the vague definition of severe insult, which is a swearing or insulting in another extremely indecent way.

  • Inflicting a severe insult is punished by a fine, ranging from $200 to $1.000.
  • Insulting by using information or communication technologies or related to the public activity of the person, is punished by a fine, ranging from $1.000 – $2.000.
  • If the perpetrator regularly targets one person, the fine can vary between $2.000-$6.000 or up to three months in prison.

In this context, the public activity includes journalism, performance of official duties, public or political activity.

According to some experts, the ultimate objective of the criminalization is not the punishing, but rather preventing such immoral behavior but other experts warn that the law will not serve for its purpose for several reasons:

  • Firstly, there is no clear definition of foul language and swearing. Probably the law will be applied arbitrary, which in turn will limit the freedom of speech and press.
  • Secondly, there is no clear mechanism how the police and investigative bodies are going to monitor and prosecute users on the internet, given the fact that many users have fake accounts and do not identify themselves.
  • Moreover, many users of social media are outside of Armenia and Armenian laws cannot by applied. Consequently, the law will create a discrimination and inequality between the people.
  • Another problematic point is that the criminal law differentiates ordinary people and public figures, providing a bigger fine in the case of the defamation of the latter’s. However, for years Armenian Civil law is moving in another direction, developing the idea that public figures must me more tolerant towards criticism, as their activity is of public interest.
  • Last, but not the least, more than two decades, the international community is moving towards the decriminalization of defamation, and current law is in opposition to the global trend.

Comparative Analysis: Is Cryptocurrency Legal in Armenia?

Despite the global development of cryptocurrencies, their regulation and legal status vary from state to state. Some states cautiously introduce laws and regulations, while others don’t and create a field of unregulated transactions. Even the regulation of the most famous crypto, bitcoin, is not unified and states’ approaches are radically different.

Here are three common ways how the states regulate bitcoin.

1.Legal

In the majority of the states the purchase, sale, use and holding of bitcoin is legal, due to either lack of regulation or special laws. Such states include France, Spain, USA.

2.  Legal, with banking ban

In some states bitcoin is legal, however financial institutions are not allowed to make crypto transactions. Such states include Canada, Russia, Turkey and China.

3. Illegal

In some states the purchase, sale, use and holding of bitcoin is considered illegal and punishable.

Such states include Egypt, Bolivia and Morocco.

In states, where the crypto is legal, it is considered as legal tender (money), virtual asset or commodity. States often refrain from calling bitcoin digital currency, virtual currency or digital money, because it would be misunderstood as a legal tender.


In June 2021, El Salvador became the world’s first country to adopt bitcoin as legal tender.


For example in the USA bitcoin is determined as commodity or digital commodity, according to the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA). Unlike securities, commodity markets operate with relatively little regulatory oversight and bitcoins are freely traded. In this case the bitcoin is taxed as a property.

There are states, for example Mexico, where bitcoin is considered as a virtual asset, which means that bitcoin is digital representation of value that can be digitally traded, transferred or used for payment. In this case, companies operating with bitcoin must register in competent authority, implement compliance programs, keep the required records, report suspicious and enforce an anti-money laundering transactions also bitcoin.

Currently, there are few states, like El Salvador and Paraguay where bitcoin is considered as a legal tender. In these states people can freely use bitcoin to pay for goods and services and recipients are obliged to accept it.

In Armenia, cryptocurrencies are under the attention of the regulator of financial markets, Central Bank. There is no direct law or regulation on cryptocurrencies and there are no license requirements for providing services related to cryptocurrencies. Consequently, it is totally legal to purchase, sale, use and hold it.

It is possible that, following the trends by some countries to regulate this field, the Central Bank may adopt relevant regulations for crypto in the future. Probably cryptocurrencies will be then treated by analogy with fiat currencies, i.e. the approach towards a foreign online cryptocurrency trading/investing platform will be the same as towards a foreign online FX trading/investing platform. However, it should be noted that the actual exchange of fiat currencies into cryptocurrencies may be treated as a currency exchange transaction. Thus, actual sale and purchase of cryptocurrencies to/from customers in Armenia may be treated as a sale and purchase of FX.

1 2 3 4 5